EFFECTS OF NURSE- LED HIGH AND LOW INTENSITY REHABILITATION APPROACHES ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48047/z3zh9d90Keywords:
Hip surgery, WHO module, nursing intervention, daily activities, pain management, quality of life, rehabilitationAbstract
Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated neuropathy that leads to rapidly progressive weakness, sensory loss, and reduced functional independence, significantly affecting quality of life. Despite advances in acute treatment, many survivors experience persistent motor deficits, fatigue, and psychosocial challenges, especially in low-resource settings. Rehabilitation plays a critical role in recovery; however, evidence remains limited regarding the comparative effectiveness of high- versus low-intensity nurse-led rehabilitation programs. Nurses are central to patient assessment, monitoring, and individualized rehabilitation planning, yet the optimal intensity of such interventions is not clearly established. This study aims to evaluate the effects of high- and low-intensity nursing rehabilitation on the quality of life of GBS patients, with the goal of providing evidence-based guidance to improve functional recovery, emotional well-being, and daily living outcomes.
Objective: To determine the effects of the Nurse- led high & low intensity rehabilitation on quality of life among Guilin -Barre syndrome patients.
Methodology: A quasi-experimental pre- and post-study design was used to evaluate the effects of nurse-led high- and low-intensity rehabilitation on the quality of life of Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) patients. A total of 40 confirmed GBS patients were selected through convenience sampling at Lahore General Hospital (PINS) from June to December 2025. Data were collected using a structured demographic form and the validated WHOQOL-BREF scale, which measured physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. The intervention was delivered in two phases, beginning with low-intensity rehabilitation followed by high-intensity nursing-led exercises and psychosocial support. Pre- and post-intervention quality-of-life scores were compared using nonparametric tests in SPSS version 22, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. This methodological approach ensured a systematic assessment of the impact of rehabilitation intensity on patient outcomes.
Results: A total of 40 participants were included, most of whom were aged 35–45 years (60%) and female (60%). Normality testing using the Shapiro–Wilk test showed that both pre- and post-intervention QOL scores were not normally distributed (p < 0.001), leading to the use of non-parametric analysis. Following the nurse-led rehabilitation program, categorical QOL levels improved markedly, with poor QOL decreasing from 42.5% to 5%, and good QOL increasing from 0% to 7.5%. The Mann–Whitney U test revealed a significant improvement in overall QOL, with the post-intervention mean rank (48.86) higher than the pre-intervention mean rank (32.14) (U = 465.500, p < 0.001), demonstrating the effectiveness of both high- and low-intensity nurse-led rehabilitation in enhancing quality of life among GBS patients.
Conclusion: he study concludes that the WHO-based nursing intervention significantly enhanced patients’ daily functioning, reduced pain, and improved overall quality of life following hip surgery. These findings highlight the importance of structured rehabilitation and nurse-led guidance in promoting faster recovery and better postoperative outcomes. The intervention model can be effectively integrated into routine clinical practice to strengthen patient-centered care.
Downloads
References
Al-Hashel, J. Y., Al-Sabah, S., & Rousseff, R. (2023). Impact of structured rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 47(2), 112–120.
Ali, S., Ahmed, R., & Parveen, N. (2023). Relationship between marital status, emotional resilience, and work performance among clinical nurses. Pakistan Journal of Nursing Practice, 6(1), 44–52.
Begum, R., & Shah, T. (2023). Challenges and adaptive strengths of rural nurses in resource-limited settings: A qualitative exploration. Rural Health Nursing Review, 18(3), 155–168.
Chen, X., Li, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). Effects of low-intensity rehabilitation on psychological well-being and functional recovery among patients with neuromuscular disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 30(2), 112–120.
Deng, H., Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2023). High-intensity multidisciplinary rehabilitation and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with neuromuscular diseases: A nursing-led approach. Rehabilitation Nursing, 48(1), 25–34.
Hassan, M., Javed, S., & Farooq, U. (2022). Urban–rural disparities in nursing workforce distribution and professional development in Pakistan. Journal of Health Systems Research, 9(4), 201–210.
Hernandez, R., Lopez, M., & Garcia, P. (2023). The role of nurse-led rehabilitation in improving adherence and patient satisfaction among individuals with neurological conditions. Nursing Practice and Research, 12(3), 145–152.
Iqbal, M., Asad, A., Khan, S., & Ahmed, N. (2021). Clinical profile and electrophysiological findings of Guillain–Barré syndrome in Pakistan: A tertiary-care hospital experience. Pakistan Journal of Neurological Sciences, 16(2), 10–16.
Kapoor, V., Dogra, S., & Sharma, R. (2019). Epidemiological trends and clinical patterns of Guillain–Barré syndrome in Northern India. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 68, 192–197.
Khan, A., Riaz, M., & Fatima, S. (2022). Effectiveness of nurse-led comprehensive rehabilitation in improving quality of life among neurological patients. International Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 14(1), 22–30.
Kuwabara, S., & Isose, S. (2022). Nursing considerations in the rehabilitation of peripheral neuropathies: A holistic approach. Journal of Neuromuscular Nursing, 5(1), 33–41.
Leonhard, S. E., Mandarakas, M. R., & van Doorn, P. A. (2019). Diagnosis and management of Guillain–Barré syndrome in ten steps. Nature Reviews Neurology, 15(11), 671–683.
Li, X., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effect of continuous nurse-supervised rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with peripheral neuropathies. Chinese Journal of Neurological Nursing, 12(4), 98–106.
Lo, C., Tan, J., & Lim, A. (2022). Comparing high- and low-intensity rehabilitation programs in chronic neurological disorders: A meta-analytic review. NeuroRehabilitation, 51(4), 567–580.
Nikolovska, L., Ismani, A., & Petrov, I. (2023). Physiotherapeutic interventions in Guillain–Barré syndrome: Early rehabilitation strategies and outcomes. European Journal of Physical Therapy, 47(1), 55–63.
Rahman, H., Bibi, S., & Ullah, I. (2021). Role of individualized nursing rehabilitation plans in improving long-term outcomes among patients with neuromuscular disorders. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation Studies, 5(2), 70–78.
Rao, V., Gupta, P., & Menon, R. (2023). Younger nurses and technological adaptability in modern rehabilitation units: A comparative cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Innovation, 8(1), 33–41.
Raposo, P., Freire, A., & Pinto, M. (2019). Long-term outcomes and residual disability in Guillain–Barré syndrome: A retrospective cohort study. Neurology International, 11(3), 210–217.
Rizvi, H., & Khan, S. (2021). Association between educational level and clinical performance among nurses in tertiary hospitals of Pakistan. Journal of Professional Nursing Practice, 10(3), 115–123.
Rostami, M., Tahernia, L., & Mohammadi, A. (2022). Clinical progression and respiratory complications in Guillain–Barré syndrome: A prospective analysis. Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease, 23(2), 85–93.
Sajid, M., Younas, A., & Kamal, F. (2021). Barriers to effective rehabilitation of Guillain-Barré Syndrome patients in low-resource healthcare settings. Pakistan Journal of Neurological Sciences, 16(2), 45–52.
Shah, S., Shrivastava, M., & Patel, R. (2022). Effects of aerobic exercise and physiotherapy interventions on functional recovery in Guillain–Barré syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 434, 120–128.
Shakya, R., Pokharel, S., & Adhikari, L. (2022). Age-related professional competence and clinical decision-making among nurses: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Nursing Skills and Practice, 7(2), 89–97.
Sheriff, A. (2019). Quality of life and daily functioning among Guillain–Barré syndrome survivors: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Neuroscience, 129(10), 1023–1031.
Singh, H., Regmi, P., & Koirala, S. (2024). Global epidemiology and clinical burden of Guillain–Barré syndrome: An updated review. Journal of Neurology and Neuroimmune Disorders, 18(1), 45–58.
Sugumar, K., Chidambaram, P., & Narayanan, S. (2022). Long-term functional outcomes in Guillain–Barré syndrome: A follow-up study. Neurology Asia, 27(2), 221–229.
Thompson, G., Miller, C., & Fraser, R. (2022). Impact of postgraduate nursing education on leadership and evidence-based practice in rehabilitation units. Nursing Leadership Review, 11(1), 50–62.
Willison, H. J., Jacobs, B. C., & van Doorn, P. A. (2021). Guillain–Barré syndrome. The Lancet, 397(10280), 1214–1228.
World Health Organization. (2023). Rehabilitation 2030: Strengthening health systems for rehabilitation. WHO Press.
Yasmeen, A., Tariq, S., & Hassan, R. (2023). Critical thinking and rehabilitation leadership competencies among postgraduate-trained nurses: A mixed-method study. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 19(1), 72–81.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rehana Tabbasum, Azeem Kaleem, Madiha Mukhtar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
