FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48047/vddrv747Keywords:
anterior cruciate ligament, ; hamstring autograft, arthroscopy, IKDC, return to sport, limb symmetryAbstract
Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft is a widely used technique for the ACL-deficient knee, but functional recovery and return-to-sport in a consecutive prospective cohort deserve continued documentation.
Objectives: To evaluate functional, clinical and stability outcomes at 6 and 12 months after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft, and to describe return to sport and complications.
Methods: A prospective cohort of 120 patients undergoing primary arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a four-strand semitendinosus–gracilis autograft was assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. Outcomes included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner activity level, range of motion, single-leg-hop and isokinetic limb-symmetry indices (LSI), Lachman and pivot-shift tests, return to sport and complications. Paired comparisons used the paired t test.
Results: The cohort (mean age 26.9 ± 6.4 years; 69.2% male) improved markedly from baseline to 12 months. Mean IKDC rose from 50.0 ± 9.4 to 89.7 ± 5.3 and Lysholm from 59.4 ± 8.8 to 92.8 ± 4.1 (both p < 0.001); VAS pain fell from 4.4 ± 1.6 to 0.9 ± 0.5 (p < 0.001). At 12 months, 71.7% had a negative Lachman and 75.8% a negative pivot-shift test; mean single-leg-hop LSI was 92.5 ± 7.6%. Return to sport at any level occurred in 48.3%, and 42.5% returned to their pre-injury Tegner level at 12 months. Complications occurred in 7 patients (5.8%) and graft failure in 2 (1.7%).
Conclusion: Arthroscopic hamstring-autograft ACL reconstruction produced large, statistically significant improvements in knee-specific function, pain and stability by 12 months, with a low complication rate; recovery of pre-injury sporting level within one year remained incomplete, underscoring the value of structured rehabilitation and realistic counselling
Downloads
References
Williams RJ, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):225–232. doi:10.2106/00004623-200402000-00003
Graham SM, Parker RD. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(402):64–75. doi:10.1097/00003086-200209000-00007
Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):2–11. doi:10.1177/03635465030310011501
Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(7):791–803. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.107
Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2006;332(7548):995–1001. doi:10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F
Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, et al. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2470–2478. doi:10.1177/0363546509333006
Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1986–1995. doi:10.1177/0363546504271211
Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA. A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):377–381. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.044818
Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH, Chou SW. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12(5):398–405. doi:10.1007/s00167-004-0498-4
Gobbi A, Francisco R. Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):1021–1028. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0050-9
Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(11):1060–1069. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x
Ahn JH, Lee SH. Anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(1):109.e1–109.e4. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.016
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
