FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Dr.Ashok reddy1 Author
  • Dr. Arun kumar Hulsoore 2 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/vddrv747

Keywords:

anterior cruciate ligament, ; hamstring autograft, arthroscopy, IKDC, return to sport, limb symmetry

Abstract

Abstract

 Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft is a widely used technique for the ACL-deficient knee, but functional recovery and return-to-sport in a consecutive prospective cohort deserve continued documentation.

Objectives: To evaluate functional, clinical and stability outcomes at 6 and 12 months after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft, and to describe return to sport and complications.

 Methods: A prospective cohort of 120 patients undergoing primary arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a four-strand semitendinosus–gracilis autograft was assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. Outcomes included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner activity level, range of motion, single-leg-hop and isokinetic limb-symmetry indices (LSI), Lachman and pivot-shift tests, return to sport and complications. Paired comparisons used the paired t test.

 Results: The cohort (mean age 26.9 ± 6.4 years; 69.2% male) improved markedly from baseline to 12 months. Mean IKDC rose from 50.0 ± 9.4 to 89.7 ± 5.3 and Lysholm from 59.4 ± 8.8 to 92.8 ± 4.1 (both p < 0.001); VAS pain fell from 4.4 ± 1.6 to 0.9 ± 0.5 (p < 0.001). At 12 months, 71.7% had a negative Lachman and 75.8% a negative pivot-shift test; mean single-leg-hop LSI was 92.5 ± 7.6%. Return to sport at any level occurred in 48.3%, and 42.5% returned to their pre-injury Tegner level at 12 months. Complications occurred in 7 patients (5.8%) and graft failure in 2 (1.7%).

Conclusion: Arthroscopic hamstring-autograft ACL reconstruction produced large, statistically significant improvements in knee-specific function, pain and stability by 12 months, with a low complication rate; recovery of pre-injury sporting level within one year remained incomplete, underscoring the value of structured rehabilitation and realistic counselling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Williams RJ, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):225–232. doi:10.2106/00004623-200402000-00003

Graham SM, Parker RD. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(402):64–75. doi:10.1097/00003086-200209000-00007

Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):2–11. doi:10.1177/03635465030310011501

Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(7):791–803. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.107

Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2006;332(7548):995–1001. doi:10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F

Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, et al. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2470–2478. doi:10.1177/0363546509333006

Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1986–1995. doi:10.1177/0363546504271211

Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA. A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):377–381. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.044818

Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH, Chou SW. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12(5):398–405. doi:10.1007/s00167-004-0498-4

Gobbi A, Francisco R. Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):1021–1028. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0050-9

Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(11):1060–1069. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x

Ahn JH, Lee SH. Anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(1):109.e1–109.e4. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.016

Downloads

Published

2019-08-19

How to Cite

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY (Dr.Ashok reddy1 & Dr. Arun kumar Hulsoore 2 , Trans.). (2019). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 48(3), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.48047/vddrv747