CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREDISPOSING FACTORS OF SUPERFICIAL FUNGAL INFECTIONS (DERMATOPHYTOSIS) AMONG PATIENTS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48047/388qpj41Keywords:
dermatophytosis, tinea; Trichophyton rubrum, predisposing factors, ; topical corticosteroid, South IndiaAbstract
Background: Dermatophytosis, the commonest superficial fungal infection of keratinised tissue, has emerged as a major public-health concern across India, where the hot and humid climate, changing lifestyles, over-the-counter topical corticosteroid misuse and irrational antifungal use have driven a surge in chronic and recurrent disease. Contemporary regional data describing the clinical profile and predisposing factors in South India remain limited. Objectives: To characterise the demographic and clinical profile, identify predisposing factors, describe the mycological spectrum, and evaluate the diagnostic yield of potassium hydroxide (KOH) microscopy and fungal culture among patients with clinically suspected dermatophytosis attending a tertiary-care dermatology service in South India. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study analysed 300 consecutive patients with clinically suspected superficial fungal infection. Demographic details, predisposing factors, clinical type, anatomical site and severity were recorded on a structured proforma. KOH microscopy and Sabouraud dextrose agar culture with species identification were performed where feasible. Descriptive statistics were computed and associations tested using the chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean age was 42.8 years (SD 21.6; range 5–80), with a male predominance (176; 58.7%; M:F 1.42:1). Tinea cruris (26.0%) and tinea corporis (22.3%) were the commonest clinical types, together accounting for nearly half of cases. The mean symptom duration was 91.7 days, and severe disease was recorded in 149 (49.7%). KOH microscopy was positive in 166 patients (55.3% of all patients; 79.4% of those tested) and culture in 91 (30.3%). Trichophyton rubrum was the predominant isolate (36; 39.6%). Frequent predisposing factors were previous tinea (32.7%), wet-work exposure (28.7%) and shared clothing or towels (25.3%); topical corticosteroid use (10.3%) and prior antifungal use (19.0%) were notable. Neither topical corticosteroid use versus multi-site involvement (p = 0.59) nor diabetes versus severity (p = 0.31) reached significance. Conclusion: Dermatophytosis affected all age groups with a male predominance, was dominated by glabrous-skin tinea and T. rubrum, and was frequently chronic and extensive. The pattern underscores the need for preventive counselling, restriction of topical-steroid misuse and antifungal stewardship in South India.
Downloads
References
Surendran KAK, Bhat RM, Boloor R, Nandakishore B, Sukumar D. A clinical and mycological study of dermatophytic infections. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59(3):262-7. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.131391
Bhagra S, Ganju SA, Kanga A, Sharma NL, Guleria RC. Mycological pattern of dermatophytosis in and around Shimla hills. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59(3):268-70. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.131392
Das S, Goyal R, Bhattacharya SN. Laboratory-based epidemiological study of superficial fungal infections. J Dermatol. 2007;34(4):248-53. doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00262.x
Surjushe A, Kamath R, Oberai C, et al. A clinical and mycological study of onychomycosis in HIV infection. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73(6):397-401. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.37057
Yadav P, Singal A, Pandhi D, Das S. Clinico-mycological study of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis in New Delhi, India. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(2):153-8. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.152511
Grover C, Arora P, Manchanda V. Tinea capitis in the pediatric population: a study from North India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010;76(5):527-32. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.69078
Choudhary SV, Bisati S, Singh AL, Koley S. Efficacy and safety of terbinafine hydrochloride 1% cream vs. sertaconazole nitrate 2% cream in tinea corporis and tinea cruris: a comparative therapeutic trial. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(6):457-60. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.119958
Andrews MD, Burns M. Common tinea infections in children. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(10):1415-20.
Ingordo V, Naldi L, Fracchiolla S, Colecchia B. Prevalence and risk factors for superficial fungal infections among Italian Navy Cadets. Dermatology. 2004;209(3):190-6. doi:10.1159/000079888
Nishimoto K. An epidemiological survey of dermatomycoses in Japan, 2002. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;47(2):103-11. doi:10.3314/jjmm.47.103
Hashemi SJ, Gerami M, Zibafar E, Daei M, Moazeni M, Nasrollahi A. Onychomycosis in Tehran: mycological study of 504 patients. Mycoses. 2010;53(3):251-5. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01703.x
Agarwalla A, Agrawal S, Khanal B. Onychomycosis in eastern Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2006;8(4):215-9.
Adefemi SA, Odeigah LO, Alabi KM. Prevalence of dermatophytosis among primary school children in Oke-Oyi community of Kwara state. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14(1):23-8. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.79235
Al-Refu K. Hair loss in children: common and uncommon causes; clinical and epidemiological study in Jordan. Int J Trichology. 2013;5(4):185-9. doi:10.4103/0974-7753.130393
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
