Association Between Dry Eye Disease and Digital Device Usage Among Adults Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Dr. Pilli Bhavani1* Dr. Pilli Bhavani1* Author
  • Dr. Hery Prabhu Alfred2 Dr. Hery Prabhu Alfred2 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/6qe1j914

Keywords:

Dry eye disease, Digital device, Screen time, Tear break-up time, Computer vision syndrome

Abstract

In this cross-sectional study involving 250 adults, a significant association was observed between digital device usage and the occurrence of dry eye disease (DED). The prevalence of DED increased progressively with daily screen exposure, rising from 22% among individuals using digital devices for less than four hours per day to 56% among those reporting more than eight hours of daily screen time. This trend highlights the substantial impact of prolonged visual display terminal use on ocular surface health. Correlation analyses further demonstrated that increased screen time was moderately associated with higher Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores (r ≈ 0.46), indicating greater symptom severity, while an inverse correlation was observed with tear break-up time (TBUT) (r ≈ −0.41), reflecting reduced tear-film stability. These findings suggest that extended digital device exposure contributes not only to subjective ocular discomfort but also to measurable physiological alterations in tear-film function. The underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial and include reduced blink frequency, increased incomplete blinking, prolonged visual concentration, and greater ocular surface evaporation during screen use. Such changes can disrupt tear-film homeostasis, resulting in ocular dryness, irritation, burning sensation, visual fatigue, and fluctuating vision. Importantly, multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that prolonged screen time remained independently associated with DED after adjusting for potential confounding factors, emphasizing that digital device use itself constitutes a significant risk factor for disease development. The findings are particularly relevant in contemporary society, where occupational, educational, and recreational activities increasingly depend on smartphones, computers, tablets, and other digital platforms. Given the widespread and often unavoidable nature of screen exposure, preventive strategies become essential. Regular blinking exercises, adherence to the 20-20-20 rule, optimization of workplace ergonomics, maintenance of adequate ambient humidity, proper screen positioning, and scheduled breaks during prolonged device use may help reduce the burden of DED. The study underscores the growing public health significance of digital eye strain and dry eye disease in the digital era. Overall, greater digital device usage was significantly associated with increased prevalence and severity of dry eye disease, accompanied by evidence of tear-film instability, supporting the implementation of screen-hygiene practices and targeted preventive interventions to preserve ocular health among frequent digital device users

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276–283.

Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):334–365.

Tsubota K, Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(8):584.

Wolkoff P, Nojgaard JK, Troiano P, Piccoli B. Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(1):4–12.

Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2018;3(1):e000146.

Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615–621.

Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):539–574.

Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):1982–1988.

Courtin R, Pereira B, Naughton G, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009675.

Portello JK, Rosenfield M, Bababekova Y, et al. Computer-related visual symptoms in office workers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32(5):375–382.

Moon JH, Kim KW, Moon NJ. Smartphone use is a risk factor for pediatric dry eye disease according to region and age: a case control study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):188.

Yazici A, Sari ES, Sahin G, et al. Change in tear film characteristics in visual display terminal users. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25(2):85–89.

Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):502–515.

Uchino M, Yokoi N, Uchino Y, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: the Osaka study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(4):759–766.

Bhargava R, Kumar P, Phogat H, et al. Oral omega-3 fatty acids treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(3):206–210.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-07

How to Cite

Association Between Dry Eye Disease and Digital Device Usage Among Adults Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study (D. P. B. Dr. Pilli Bhavani1* & D. H. P. A. Dr. Hery Prabhu Alfred2 , Trans.). (2021). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 51(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.48047/6qe1j914