AN ANALYSIS OF THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC, FOCUSING ON THE TYPOLOGY, OUTCOMES, PROCESSES, AND CONTINGENCIES INVOLVED

Authors

  • LU YANNI Author
  • OYYAPPAN DURAIPANDI Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/fg205692

Keywords:

Classification, Employee Involvement, Expenditures and Benefits, Business Contingencies.

Abstract

Research on workplace design emphasizes the positive features of public interactions with workers rather than portraying them in a negative light. Evidence from research on emotional labor and burnout contradicts this. Since several literary schools take such firm positions, the authors of the research argue, competing viewpoints naturally arise. Workers' contacts with the public may be categorized as cooperative, mistreated, or appreciative based on valence (positive or negative) and content (affect-based or task-based). This paradigm is built and evaluated in this dissertation. The researcher may predict how happy and productive the employees will be in the future by looking at their emotional tiredness, job satisfaction, task completion, rudeness, and customer proactiveness. Also considered are the processes and boundary conditions that have an effect on these results. Staff morale and productivity are impacted by positive and negative public encounters, according to multilevel studies of service employee-supervisor dyads in various Chinese organizations. According to the study, staff members may not always be negatively affected by unfavorable customer contacts, even those that are unhelpful or confrontational. Patterns, mediation procedures, and boundary limitations are the focus of this investigation of the links between public engagement in the workplace and notable outcomes. The findings have significant implications for the study and practice of customer service performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakker, A.B. & Oerlemans, W.G.M. (2019) Daily job crafting and momentary work engagement: a self-determination and self-regulation perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112(2018), 417–430.

Breevaart, K. & Bakker, A.B. (2018) Daily job demands and employee work engagement: the role of daily transformational leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 338–349.

Chong, S., Kim, Y.J., Lee, H.W., Johnson, R.E. & Lin, S.-H. (2020) Mind your own break! The interactive effect of workday respite activities and mindfulness on employee outcomes via affective linkages. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 159, 64–77.

Dlouhy, K. & Casper, A. (2021) Downsizing and surviving employees’ engagement and strain: the role of job resources and job demands. Human Resource Management, 60, 435–454.

Fida, R., Game, A., Stepanek, M. & Gendronneau, C. (2022) Longitudinal effects of engagement with workplace health programmes on employee outcomes: a relational perspective. British Journal Management.

Hu, R. (2020) “COVID-19, smart work, and collaborative space: a crisis-opportunity perspective”. Journal of Urban Management, 9(3), 276–280.

Liu, D., Chen, Y. & Li, N. (2021) Tackling the negative impact of COVID-19 on work engagement and taking charge: a multi-study investigation of frontline health workers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 185–198.

Murmura, F. & Bravi, L. (2021) Digitization and sustainability: smart working as an ICT tool to improve the sustainable performance of companies during the Covid-19 pandemic. Digital transformation in industry. Cham: Springer, 97–108.

Ozyilmaz, A. (2020) Hope and human capital enhance job engagement to improve workplace outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 187–214.

Peccei, R. & Van De Voorde, K. (2019) Human resource management–well-being–performance research revisited: past, present, and future. Human Resource Management Journal, 29, 539–563.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-22

How to Cite

AN ANALYSIS OF THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC, FOCUSING ON THE TYPOLOGY, OUTCOMES, PROCESSES, AND CONTINGENCIES INVOLVED (L. YANNI & O. . DURAIPANDI , Trans.). (2024). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 53(03), 4934-4941. https://doi.org/10.48047/fg205692