COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AFTER BRUSHING SIMULATION - AN IN VITRO STUDY

Authors

  • Monesh Babu J D , Balaji Ganesh S , S. Jayalakshmi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/r07qdm48

Keywords:

Temporary restoration, innovative measurement, brushing, zinc oxide eugenol, intermediate restorative material

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Temporary restoration is a temporary filling of a prepared tooth until permanent
restoration is carried out. Brushing simulator machines are capable of running programmable threedimensional brushing patterns. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the retention of two different
temporary restorative materials after brushing simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present
study eight teeth which include maxillary and mandibular first and second molar teeth were collected. Class 1
cavity preparation was done in the collected natural teeth and restored with two types of different temporary
restorative materials such as zinc oxide Eugenol and IRM. Once the restoration was completed for all 8
samples, they were subjected to brushing simulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-03

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AFTER BRUSHING SIMULATION - AN IN VITRO STUDY (Monesh Babu J D , Balaji Ganesh S , S. Jayalakshmi , Trans.). (2025). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 54(3), 2975-2983. https://doi.org/10.48047/r07qdm48