DRY NEEDLING VERSUS INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME OF HAMSTRINGS MUSCLES: A PILOT STUDY

Authors

  • E Lazkano-Juaristi Ejercicio libre de la profesión. Madrid, España Author
  • R Delgado-Delgado Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Salud y Educación. Universidad Camilo José Cela. Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, España Author
  • E S Rodriguez-Lopez Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Salud y Educación. Universidad Camilo José Cela. Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, España Author
  • J A Valera-Calero Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Salud y Educación. Universidad Camilo José Cela. Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, España, Escuela Internacional de Doctorado. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Alcorcón, Madrid, España Author

Keywords:

myofascial pain syndromes, trigger point, lower xxtremity, musculoskeletal pain.

Abstract

 Introduction: Dry Needling (DN) is a treatment technique that is minimally invasive, effective and low risk for treating trigger points. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of DN technique carried out on biceps femoris compared to the Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) technique in subjects with Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS). Material and method: a randomized clinical trial was conducted on 16 sub-jects divided into two experimental groups (GE1: n = 8 and GE2: n = 8). DN was applied to GE1 and IASTM to GE2.
or three weeks, this trial measured the active and passive range of motion (ROM) of knee and hip and the pressure pain threshold (PPT) on myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) before and after the treatment. Two separate treatment sessions were carried out for 7 days and a follow-up without intervention in the third week. Results: there was a statistically significant increase (p < 0.01) in the pressure pain threshold within the groups, but no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between groups. Conclusions: dry needling and IASTM technique seem to be equally effective in increasing the pressure pain threshold of the hamstring trigger points.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

Issue

Vol. 49 No. 2 (2020): Year 2020, Volume 49, Issue 2

Section

Original

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

How to Cite

Lazkano-Juaristi , E., Delgado-Delgado , R., Rodriguez-Lopez , E. S., & Valera-Calero , J. A. (2020). DRY NEEDLING VERSUS INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME OF HAMSTRINGS MUSCLES: A PILOT STUDY. Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 49(2), 110-118. https://cuestionesdefisioterapia.com/index.php/cf/article/view/142