PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES OF THE EFL TEACHERS AT THE PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN BANGLADESH

Authors

  • Dr. Md. Sazzad Hossain Professor, Department of English, Dhaka International University, Badda, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author
  • Dr. Md. Abul Kalam Azad Associate Professor, Department of English, Dhaka International University, Badda, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author
  • Dr. Md. Kamrul Hasan Associate Professor, Department of English, BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology, Dhaka-1230, Bangladesh Author
  • Mohammad Shah Alam Chowdhury Professor, Department of English, Dhaka International University, Badda, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/m93jjp67

Keywords:

Pedagogical practices, communicative exercises, EFL instructors, private universities, Bangladesh, curriculum constraints, adaptable teaching approach.

Abstract

Public and private universities in Bangladesh have significantly prioritized teaching and learning of the English language.  However, studies reveal that a large number of graduates struggle in their careers due to a lack of proficiency in the English language.  As a result, research will inevitably advance the teaching-learning status of English at this level of education.  This study primarily examines the English teaching landscape at private universities in Bangladesh, particularly emphasizing the pedagogical practices employed by English language instructors.  A Mixed Method Research approach was employed for data collection and analysis for the study. Besides, this study involved the random selection of 60 English teachers from 10 private universities in the Dhaka division of Bangladesh. The data for this study were gathered using a teacher questionnaire and a classroom observation checklist. The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistical methods.  Qualitative analysis employed a constant comparative method.  The researcher discovered that the majority of EFL teachers did not adhere to the teaching method outlined in the university curriculum; instead, they opted for an eclectic approach, without taking into account the lesson objectives and the students' abilities. Moreover, the teachers lacked sufficient preparation for implementing practical teaching methods due to the absence of monitoring and evaluation by university authorities or other institutions. Typically, teachers presented traditional lectures while students listened and attempted to comprehend the content, whether intentionally or unintentionally. When it comes to classroom activities, the majority of teachers seldom ever employed any communicative exercises to help their students get better at English.  Insufficient and unsuitable speaking and listening exercises were planned by the teachers themselves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bai, B., & Yuan, R. (2018). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about pronunciation teaching. ELT Journal, 73(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy040

Calafato, R. (2019). Policies, textbooks, and curriculum constraints to integrating literature into language education: EFL teacher perspectives from Russia. Pedagogika, 132(4), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2018.132.11

Chen, H. and Zhang, Y. (2019). Research on the teaching of college comprehensive English based on production-oriented approach. English Literature and Language Review, (512), 184-187. https://doi.org/10.32861/ellr.512.184.187

Chowdhury, R., & Ha, P.L. (2008). Reflecting on western TESOL training and communicative language teaching: Bangladeshi teachers‘ voices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 305-316.

Ding, A. E., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Lu, Y., & Glazewski, K. (2019). EFL Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and practices with regard to using technology. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1537816

Fogal, G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics, 24(1), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014555450

Hamid, M.O., & Baldauf, R.B. (2008). Will CLT bail out the bogged down ELT in Bangladesh? English Today, 24(3), 16-24.

Huang, S. (2021). Design and development of educational robot teaching resources using artificial intelligence technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(05), 116. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i05.20311

Islam, M. (2013). English Medium Instruction in the Private Universities in Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.195

Khair, I. (2022). Realities and impacts of teaching approach and method in bilingual classroom in Indonesia. Parole Journal of Linguistics and Education, 12(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v12i1.103-118

Khaskheli, F., Aijaz, S., Syed, M., & Shah, W. (2021). Attitudes of foreign language teaching assistants towards teaching of English in Pakistani context. JLLL. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlll/78-03

Kustati, M., Yusuf, Y., Hallen, H., Al-Azmi, H., & Sermal, S. (2020). EFL teachers’ attitudes towards language learners: a case of multicultural classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13124a

Lee, G. and Wallace, A. (2017). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: outcomes and perceptions. Tesol Quarterly, 52(1), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.372

Little, A., Shojo, M., Sonnadara, D., & Aturupane, H. (2018). Teaching English as a second language in Sri Lankan primary schools: opportunity and pedagogy. Language Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1532437

Mao, L. and Zhang, Y. (2018). English teaching innovation classroom based on whole brain theory. Neuroquantology, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1328

Radosavlevikj, N. (2021). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions and challenges in communicative language teaching. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 307. https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap2003307r

Rahman, H. (1999). English language teaching in Bangladesh: Didactics on the pragmatics of a foreign language teaching policy. In Hunter, T. (ed). National and Regional Issues in Language Teaching: International Perspective (ELTIP Conference Proceeding). Dhaka: The British Council. (pp. 5-32).

Rianti, W., Hardi, V., Afriyeni, Y., & Rasyidah, U. (2022). Analysis of teaching writing strategies. Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3705-3712. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1866

Rui, S., Zhang, H., Li, J., Zhao, J., & Dong, P. (2020). Assessment-for-learning teaching mode based on interactive teaching approach in college English. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(21), 24. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.18029

Sun, H. (2020). The learning method of peer review in college English writing course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(05), 156. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.13775

Uddin, M. E. (2014). Teachers’ pedagogical belief and its reflection on the practice in teaching writing in EFL tertiary context in Bangladesh. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 01(03). https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v1no3a5

Utami, D. N. (2016). The EFL teachers’ beliefs and their teaching practices. OKARA Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v10i2.974

Wang, H. and Xu, J. (2023). L1 as a tool for reducing the affective filter. SHS Web of Conferences, 168, 02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316802014

Zhao, Y. (2020). A personalized English teaching design based on multimedia computer technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(08), 210. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.13695

Downloads

Published

2024-08-12

How to Cite

PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES OF THE EFL TEACHERS AT THE PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN BANGLADESH (M. S. Hossain, M. A. K. Azad, M. K. Hasan, & M. S. A. Chowdhury , Trans.). (2024). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 53(03), 5378-5390. https://doi.org/10.48047/m93jjp67