PERCEIVED EFFECTIVENESS OF HOMEOPATHIC REMEDIES IN THE TREATMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48047/hhfz1r73Keywords:
Homeopathy, psychological disorders, public perception, efficacy, skepticism, clinical trials, evidence-based approach.Abstract
This population-based study explores public perceptions of homeopathic remedies in treating psychological disorders. Findings reveal varying views on the efficacy of specific remedies, with skepticism notably prevalent for depression, stress, and schizophrenia. Robust clinical trials and scientific evidence are essential to bridge the gap between conventional and complementary mental healthcare, underlining the need for an evidence-based approach in this complex landscape.
Downloads
References
Cukaci, C.; Freissmuth, M.; Mann, C.; Marti, J.; Sperl, V. Against all odds-the persistent popularity of homeopathy. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2020, 132, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mathie, R.T.; Lloyd, S.M.; Legg, L.A.; Clausen, J.; Moss, S.; Davidson, J.R.T.; Ford, I. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2014, 3, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cucherat, M.; Haugh, M.C.; Gooch, M.; Boissel, J.P. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. HMRAG. Homeopathic Medicines Research Advisory Group. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 56, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Betti, L.; Trebbi, G.; Majewsky, V.; Scherr, C.; Shah-Rossi, D.; Jäger, T.; Baumgartner, S. Use of homeopathic preparations in phytopathological models and in field trials: A critical review. Homeopathy 2009, 98, 244–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fisher, P.; Dantas, F.; Rampes, H. The safety of homeopathic products. J. R. Soc. Med. 2012, 95, 474–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jones, R. Homeopathic Universities and Schools in the U.S. Available online: https://study.com/homeopathic_university.html (accessed on 11 December 2020).
Ernst, E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 54, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
