Assessment of the ponseti method for clubfoot deformity management in newborns

Authors

  • Dr.Arun Prasad D& Dr.Benabraham Assistant professor, department of general surgery, bhaarath medical college and hospital, 173, agraram main road, selaiyur, Chennai – 600073. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/02znyf65

Keywords:

:ponseti method, clubfoot deformity, neonates, non-surgical treatment, ctev (congenital talipes equinovarus)

Abstract

This research seeks to establish the efficacy of ponseti technique when using it to manage congenital talipes equinovarus (ctev) deformities amongst newborns. The ponseti method was used in treating neonates with ctev. Neonates who had other conditions like meningocele, meningomyelocele, arthrogryposis or other neuromuscular conditions were not included. A standardized form was used to collect the data; this form contained demographic data, physical examination findings, management history (including pirani scoring) and complications. Therapy consisted of soft foot manipulation, then serial casting, and percutaneous achilles tenotomy as needed. Among these, 37 feet (63.8 percent) were rigid, and 21 feet (36.2 percent) were non-rigid. The pre-treatment pirani score had an average of 5.57 and the average number of casts that were applied per foot was 3.75. In 86.2% of the feet percutaneous tenotomy was carried out. The treatment success rate was 96.6 percent. The complications were few and included three instances (5.2%) of skin excoriations and blister formation. The average post treatment pirani score was 0.36 0.43. Ponseti technique is a minimally invasive, less expensive, and effective in the treatment of ctev among neonates. It headed excellent anatomical and functional outcomes with minimal complications. The best results rely on early start of treatment and on bracing protocol compliance. This method can be applied in both resource-permitted and resource-restricted settings and offers success rates that are high and low invasive surgical intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arif m, inam m, sattar a, shabir m. Usefulness of ponseti technique in management of congenital telipesequino-varus. J pak orthop assoc. 2011; 23:62-4.

Ponseti iv. Clubfoot management. J pediatrorthop. 2000; 20:699-700.

Colburn m, williams m. Evaluation of the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by using the ponseti method. J foot ankle surg. 2003; 42:259-67.

Adegbehingbe oo, oginni lm, ogundele oj, ariyibi al, abiola po, ojo od. Ponseti clubfoot management: changing surgical trends in nigeria. Iowa orthop j. 2010; 30:7-14.

Ippolito e, farsetti p, caterini r, tudisco c. Long- term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J bone joint surg am. 2003; 85:1286-94.

Göksan sb. [treatment of congenital clubfoot with the ponseti method]. Actaorthoptraumatolturc. 2002; 36:281-7.

Bor n, coplan ja, herzenberg je. Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: minimum 5-year followup. Clinorthoprelat res. 2009; 467:1263-70.

Cooper dm, dietz fr. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J bone joint surg am. 1995; 77:1477-89.

Porecha mm, parmar ds, chavda hr. Mid-term results of ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot-(a study of 67 clubfeet with mean five year follow-up). J orthopsurg res. 2011; 6:3.

Agarwal ra, suresh ms. And agarwal r. Treatment of congenital clubfoot with ponseti method. Indian j orthop. 2005; 39:244-7.

Dyer pj, davis n. The role of the pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the ponseti method. J bone joint surg br. 2006; 88:1082-4.

Beaty jh. Cogenital anomalies of the lower extremity. In: canale t. And beaty jh. Editors. Campbells operative orthopaedics 11th ed. Philadelphia, pennsylvania: mosby elsevier; 2007; pp.1079-1100

Gupta a, singh s, patel p, patel j, varshney mk. Evaluation of the utility of the ponseti method of correction of clubfoot deformity in a developing nation. Intorthop. 2008; 32:75-9.

Morcuende ja, dolan la, dietz fr, ponseti iv. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004; 113:376-80.

Cowell hr, wein bk. Genetic aspects of club foot. J bone joint surg am. 1980; 62:1381-4.

Palmer rm. The genetics of talipes equinovarus. J bone joint surg am. 1964; 46:542-56.

Gavrankapetanović i, baždar e. Evaluation of the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by using the ponseti method. B h surgery. 2011;1:45-47.

Halanski ma, davison je,. Huang jc,walker cg, walsh sj crawford ha. Ponseti method compared with surgical treatment of clubfoot -a prospective comparison. J bone joint surg am. 2010; 92: 270-8.

Dobbs mb, gordon je, walton t, schoenecker p. Bleeding complication following percutaneous tendoachillestenotomy in the treatment of clubfoot deformity. J pediatrorthop. 2004; 24:353-7.

Bor n, herzenberg je, frick sl. Ponseti management of clubfoot in older infants. Clinorthoprelat res. 2006; 444:224-8.

Zionts le, dietz fr. Bracing following correction of idiopathic clubfoot using the ponseti method. J am acadorthop surg. 2010; 18:486-93.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-22

How to Cite

Assessment of the ponseti method for clubfoot deformity management in newborns (D. A. P. D. Dr. Ben abraham2 , Trans.). (2022). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 51(1), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.48047/02znyf65