A Comparative Study Of Clinical And Functional Outcome Of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Graft Vs Semitendinosus, Gracilis Graft”

Authors

  • Dr. Nithin Mathew 1. 3rd Year Post Graduate, Department Of Orthopedics, Vinayaka Missions Kirupanada Variyar Medical College, Salem. Author
  • Dr. Rachamalla Siva Shankara Krishnavamsi 2. Senior Resident, Department Of Orthopedics, Vinayaka Missions Kirupanada Variyar Medical College, Salem. Author
  • Dr. Monishkumar R 3. 2nd Year Post Graduate, Department Of Orthopedics, Vinayaka Missions Kirupanada Variyar Medical College, Salem. Author
  • Dr. Akilan Ns 4. 2nd Year Post Graduate, Department Of Orthopedics, Vinayaka Missions Kirupanada Variyar Medical College, Salem. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/58fmw977

Keywords:

Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Peroneus Longus, Semi Tendinosis, Graft.

Abstract

Introduction:

The Anterior Cruciate Ligaments (Acl) Injury Is A Contentious Topic In Which Extensive Research Was Done Worldwide For 2 Decades. Unlike Pcl, Acl Is Less Robust As Well As More Susceptible To Tearing. This Susceptibility Contributes To Instability In The Front Of The Knee When The Acl Is Torn, Which Is A Significant Clinical Challenge.

Aim And Objectves:

To Study The Pathology And Physiology Of The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Disruption, To Study The Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus And To Study The Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus.

Materials And Methods:

A Prospective Study Was Done On 40 Consecutive Subjects Those Undergone Arthroscopy Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction From October 2022 To June 2024at Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupanandavariyar Medical College And Hospitals At Seeragapadi, Salem Reconstruction Utilized St Tendon, Gracilis Tendon As Well As Fibularis Longus Tendon. All Patients Who Were Aged Between 15-60 Years, Who Were Skeletally Mature And Diagnosed With An Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Had Been Established By Performing Lachman Evaluation, Alongside Concurrent Meniscal Or Collateral Ligament Tears Requiring Repair, Were Eligible For Inclusion In This Academic Research. On Condition That Subjects Are Fit In Undergoing Rehab Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Which Involved Complete Load -Bearing Walking As Well As Unrestricted No-Load-Bearing Rom Were Included In The Study.

Results:

The Comparison Of Functional Outcome Between The Two Groups. Functional Outcome Was Measured Using Lysholm Scoring System, Which Was Assessed At 3 Months And At 12 Months. It Is Inferred From The Table That There Is No Difference Which Is Significant In The Functional Outcome Among 2 Groups Both At 12 Weeks As Well As At 12 Months.  A Statistical Significant Improvement Is Observed In Functional Scores Among Both Groups At The End Of 12 Months In Comparison With The Score At 3 Months.

 Conclusion:

Morphologically The Peroneus Longus Has Better Features Than Semitendinosus In The Construction Of Aclgraft, Statistically Both The Semitendinosus And Peroneus Longus Has Similar Results However Functionally Pl Is A Better Graft In Female Subgroup, The Pl Tendon Is Particularly Beneficial Among Cases Involving Complex Injuries, Such As Those Affecting The Mcl, Having A Review Of Approximately 24months.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moore Kl. The Knee Joint In: Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 2nd Ed. Williams & Wilkins 1985: P.523-41.

Corner Em. The Exploration Of The Knee Joint: With Some Illustrative Cases. Br J Surg 1914;2: P.191–204.

Hey-Groves Ew. The Crucial Ligaments Of The Knee Joint: Their Function, Rupture And The Operative Treatment Of The Same. Br J Surg1920; 7:505–15.

Smith A. The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Injuries Of Crucial Ligaments. Br J Surg 1918;6: P.176–89.

Strobel Mj, Editor. Anterior Cruciate Ligament. In: Textbook Of Manual Of Arthroscopic Surgery. 1st Ed. Heidelberg Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1998:P.67-9.

Watanabe M. The Development And Present Status Of The Arthroscope [In Japanese]. J Jpn Med Instr 1954;25: P.11.

Dandy Dj, Jonathan Lh. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B (2) March 1998:189-90.

Biau, David J Md, Tournoux, Caroline Md, Katsahian, Sandrine Md, Et Al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta - Analysis Of Functional Scores. Clin Orthop And Related Research 2007 May; 458:180-7.

Bonnet A. Traite Des Maladies Articularis. 2nd Ed. Bailliere Paris 1853: P.354- 7.

Bonnet A. Traite Des Maladies Des Articularis Vol 1&2 Avec Atlas. Bailliere Paris 1845.

Robert H Miller: Knee Injuries; In Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. Vol-3 11th Ed. Mosby Elsevier Philadelphia 2008.

Mayo Robson A.W. Ruptured Cruciate Ligaments And Their Repair By Operation. Ann Surg1903;37:716-8.

Lange F. Uber Die Schnenplastik. Verh Dtschorthopges1903;2:10-2

Hey Groves Ew. Operation For The Repair Of Cruciate Ligament. Lancet 1917;2: 674-5.

Kerimoğlu S, Aynaci O, Saraçoğlu M, Aydin H, Turhan Au. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With The Peroneus Longus Ten-Don [In Turkish]. Acta Orthoptraumatolturc 2008;42(01):38–43

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

A Comparative Study Of Clinical And Functional Outcome Of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Graft Vs Semitendinosus, Gracilis Graft” (N. Mathew, . R. . Siva Shankara Krishnavamsi, . M. R, & A. Ns , Trans.). (2024). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 53(03), 5340-5347. https://doi.org/10.48047/58fmw977