Comparison of the Efficacy of Non-Surgical Treatment by Caudal Epidural Injection versus Oral Prostaglandin E1 Analogue for Management of Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Authors

  • Ibrahim Najm Abed, Walid Hemdan , Abdelrahman Ahmed Momtaz , Abdallah Wael Kamar , Ahmad Wadhah Yahya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/kwjsat54

Keywords:

Non-Surgical; Caudal Epidural Injection; Oral; Prostaglandin E1 Analogue; Management; Lumbar Canal Stenosis.

Abstract

Background: degenerative changes in the spinal canal of the lower back lead to a narrowing condition known as lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).   Lumbar canal stenosis non-surgical therapy options, including caudal epidural injection and oral Prostaglandin E1 analogue, were the focus of this research. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with lumbar canal stenosis attending to orthopedic clinic Benha university hospital and Nile Health Insurance Hospital. They were divided into 2 equal groups: Group A treated by caudal epidural injection and Group B treated by oral Prostaglandin E1. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Katz JN, Zimmerman ZE, Mass H, Makhni MC. Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review. JAMA. 2022;327:88-99.

Lee BH, Moon SH, Suk KS, Kim HS, Yang JH, Lee HM. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment Principle: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J. 2020;14:68293.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-03

How to Cite

Comparison of the Efficacy of Non-Surgical Treatment by Caudal Epidural Injection versus Oral Prostaglandin E1 Analogue for Management of Lumbar Canal Stenosis (Ibrahim Najm Abed, Walid Hemdan , Abdelrahman Ahmed Momtaz , Abdallah Wael Kamar , Ahmad Wadhah Yahya , Trans.). (2024). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 53(03), 5006-5017. https://doi.org/10.48047/kwjsat54