Comparison between Self-retaining retractor and conventional retractor in condylar fracture fixation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48047/4tkjtw34Keywords:
Condylar fracture, Retromandibular approach, Langenbeck retractor, visibility, exposureAbstract
Aim: This study aims to compare the operative time efficiency between self-retaining retractors and
conventional (Langenbeck) retractors during mandibular condyle fixation via the retromandibular
approach. Methodology: A total of 60 patients were divided into two groups: the study group (selfretaining retractor, n = 30) and the control group (Langenbeck retractor, n = 30). The primary outcome
measured was total operative time. Secondary parameters included the number of assistants required,
surgical field exposure, and visibility
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
