Comparison of a Combination of Intranasal Midazolam and Nitrous Oxide Versus Intravenous Midazolam for Patients Undergoing Surgical Extraction of Impacted Teeth under conscious sedation: A Randomised Control Trial

Authors

  • Dr. Roohika Sharma , Dr. Ramsesh Manohar , Dr. Melvin George , Dr. K Murugesan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/93g04966

Keywords:

Intranasal midazolam, Nitrous oxide, Intravenous midazolam, Conscious sedation, Onset of action, Depth of sedation, Recovery time

Abstract

Introduction: Effective sedation during surgical procedures is crucial for patient comfort and cooperation. This study focuses on comparing the onset of action, depth of sedation, recovery time, and adverse effects between a combination of intranasal midazolam and nitrous oxide (INM-NO) and intravenous midazolam (IVM) for conscious sedation during the surgical extraction of impacted teeth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kaufman E, Davidson E, Sheinkman Z, Magora F. Comparison between intranasal and intravenous midazolam sedation (with or without patient control) in a dental phobia clinic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Aug;52(8):840-3; discussion 844. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90232-1. PMID: 8040738.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Comparison of a Combination of Intranasal Midazolam and Nitrous Oxide Versus Intravenous Midazolam for Patients Undergoing Surgical Extraction of Impacted Teeth under conscious sedation: A Randomised Control Trial (Dr. Roohika Sharma , Dr. Ramsesh Manohar , Dr. Melvin George , Dr. K Murugesan , Trans.). (2025). Cuestiones De Fisioterapia, 54(4), 981-986. https://doi.org/10.48047/93g04966